It seems my dilemma with River of Lost Souls has come to an important crossroads. In an earlier post (To Hatch Or Not To Hatch?) I fought with the idea that the book might have resurrected too soon, thus explaining my reluctance to bite the bullet and dive into the arduous task of preparing it for publication.
Have you ever tasted brass laced with lead? It’s not a 5-star delicacy even in an army mess hall. The lead is too soft and the brass is too tough. Irreconcilable textures aside, the taste is flat, and to swallow the lot could mean real trouble.
Try as I might, I couldn’t resolve to bite hard enough and long enough to break through the casing to get to the black powder (as if that would bring just reward for my long-suffering).
So, finally, I did the only sane thing and spit the bullet to the ground and kicked it far enough away to temp me no longer.
That was over a week ago and as of yesterday my decision to bail out continued unflinchingly steadfast.
Today, however, I experienced a revelation: But a moment of heady enlightenment it certainly was not.
River of Lost Souls isn’t a book before its time. It’s a book much too disjointed and unfocused to waste precious time on!
There, now I’ve said it. Now you know. If only you could imagine the realization’s impact on my professionalism.
What? I’ve written a complete book, 150,000 words, and it’s an abysmal failure?
Yep, pretty much. The story is schizophrenic and the focus is worse than Hubble before eyeglasses.
Pardon the hand-wringing and the pathetic whimpering. How could such a thing happen? An entire book a complete waste!
Simmer down, Gary. The book is indeed a train wreck, but at least it traveled down the tracks long enough to crash.
Yes, debris covers the rail bed and the right-of-way, and the crash site stinks of spilled diesel and charred remains, but much of what’s left is salvageable.
Salvageable? At what cost? Do you have any idea how much work you’re talking about?
Hey, I’m your alter-ego, buster. Of course I know how much work we’re talking about. Believe me, I’ve no intention of leaving you in a lurch. I’ll be right there with you, through every change of plot, every rewrite of dialogue, through every painful moment of altering the outline, through every wretched throb of trying to piece the wreck back together again.
Yeah, but why bother? Why not toss it and write another book. In my experience, that would be immeasurably easier than rebuilding a disaster.
Because you said earlier that Javier DeSomo is a decent and well-deserving boy. And such a fine youngster should have his coming of age, should he not?
Uh, perhaps. But oh so much work.
But oh so much weakness. Is not a good book worthy of such effort?
Oh my, yes ,,, if the book turns out good. Maybe it derails again. How will I ever endure?
Quit your sniveling. Had we not learned a few important lessons on the first draft, would we be capable of discrimination now?
I … I guess not.
Are you not partly responsible for the ideal that “Writing is Fun”?
Quit attacking me with simplicity. A rewrite of River of Lost Souls will take months.
Years if you don’t quit stalling. Buck up, Mr. Professional and take you medicine. Javier DeSomo needs to grow up and so do you. The book promises the stars and you quiver like a noodle in a boiling pot. Negativity be gone. Pick up the first piece of wreckage and analyze it. Is it broken or not? Can it be reused? If not, replace it and pick up the next. Just that simple. Writing a good, even a great book isn’t about shortcuts. It’s about recognizing what’s broken and fixing it. Here are your work gloves. Put them on. I’ll take this side of the track and you take the other. We’ll rebuild until we meet in the middle and then Javier DeSomo will have grown up with us along with him.
River of Lost Souls isn’t just about Javier’s coming of age. It’s about our coming of age too.
Pass me the pain ointment, partner. It’s time we turn left and not right.